Dr. Muhamd Khamis Zaytoun
Assistant Professor, Accounting Department, Arab East Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

MLA 8
Zaytoun, Dr. Muhamd Khamis. "THE EFFECT OF ACTIVATING THE ROLE OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE ON AUDITOR’S SOUND JUDGMENT ABOUT MATERIAL MISSTATEMENTS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION IN EGYPT." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 5, no. 10, Oct. 2020, pp. 3169-3192, doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2020.v05i10.023. Accessed Oct. 2020.
APA 6
Zaytoun, D. (2020, October). THE EFFECT OF ACTIVATING THE ROLE OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE ON AUDITOR’S SOUND JUDGMENT ABOUT MATERIAL MISSTATEMENTS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION IN EGYPT. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 5(10), 3169-3192. doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2020.v05i10.023
Chicago
Zaytoun, Dr. Muhamd Khamis. "THE EFFECT OF ACTIVATING THE ROLE OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE ON AUDITOR’S SOUND JUDGMENT ABOUT MATERIAL MISSTATEMENTS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION IN EGYPT." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 5, no. 10 (October 2020), 3169-3192. Accessed October, 2020. doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2020.v05i10.023.

References

[1]. Abdul Karim, A. A. 1991. The Impact of the Auditor’s Personal Judgment on the Results of Statistical Inference in the Auditing. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Faculty of Commerce, Tanta University.
[2]. Albring, S., D. Robinson, and M. Robinson. 2014. Audit Committee Financial Expertise, Corporate Governance, and the Voluntary Switch from Auditor-Provided to Non-Auditor-Provided Tax Services. Advances in Accounting. 30(1): 81-94.
[3]. Aly, A. W. 2005. Mechanisms of Positive Governance Role of New Report by the Auditor. Conference on Corporate Governance, Faculty of Commerce, Alexandria University.
[4]. Auditing Practices Board (APB). 2010. Auditor Skepticism: Raising the Bar. Discussion paper, APB.
[5]. ———. 2012. Professional Scepticism Establishing A Common Understanding and Reaffirming its Central Role in Delivering Audit Quality. APB
[6]. Badolato, P. G., D. C. Donelson, and M. Ege. 2014. Audit Committee Financial Expertise and Earnings Management: The Role of Status. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 58(2): 208-230.
[7]. Ballou, B., and D. L. Heitger. 2004. Judgment and Decision- Making Research in A Dynamic Auditing Environment. Working Paper, Auburn University.
[8]. Bell, T. B., M. E. Peecher, and I. Solomon. 2005. The 21st Century Public Company Audit. New York, NY: KPMG LLP.
[9]. Bhattacharjee, S., K. K. Moreno and J. S. Pyzoha. 2014. The Influence of Audit Committee Intervention Approach on Auditor and Client Judgments During Accounting Disputes. Northeastern U. D’Amore-McKim School of Business Research Paper.
[10]. Brazel, J. F., S. B. Jackson., T. J. Schaefer, and B. W. Stewart. 2013. Hindsight Bias and Professional Skepticism: Does the End Justify the Means?. Working Paper presented at the 7th EARNet Symposium in Trier, Germany.
[11]. Brewster, B. E. 2012. An Experimental Investigation of Delayed Persuasion During Analytical Procedures: Are Auditors Susceptible to the Sleeper Effect? Working paper, The University of Texas at Arlington.
[12]. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA). 1995. Professional Judgment and the Auditor. Toronto. Canada.
[13]. Center for Audit Quality (CAQ). 2014. Professional Judgment Resource. Available at: http://www.thecaq.org
[14]. Christensen, B. E., T. C. Omer., M. K. Shelley, and P. A. Wong. 2015. Audit Committee Influence on Audit Firm Selection, Retention, Efficiency, and Fees. Retention, Efficiency, and Fees. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com
[15]. Dechow , P . M ., R. G . Sloan , and A . P Sweeney . 1996. Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation : An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions By the Sec. Contemporary Accounting Research. 13 ( spring ) : pp 1 – 36
[16]. DeZoort, T., and S. Salterio. 2001. The Effects of Corporate Governance Experience and Financial Reporting and Audit Knowledge of Audit Committee Members Judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20 (2): 31-47.
[17]. Ebaid, El-Sayed I. 2011. Corporate Governance Practices and Auditor's Client Acceptance Decision: Empirical Evidence from Egypt. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society. 11(2): 171-183.
[18]. Fazal, H. 2011. How Professional Judgment and Professional Skepticism are Different in Application? Available at: http://pakaccountants.com.
[19]. Glover, S. M., and D.F. Prawitt. 2014. Practitioner Summary: Enhancing Auditor Professional Skepticism: The Professional Skepticism Continuum. Current Issues in Auditing 8 (2): 1-10.
[20]. Glover, S. M., D.F. Prawitt and KPMG LLP. 2012. Enhancing Board Oversight: Avoiding Judgment Traps and Biases. Research Commissioned by Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
[21]. Goodwin, J., and J. L. Seow. 2002. The Influence of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on The Quality of Financial Reporting and Auditing: Perceptions of Auditors and Directors in Singapore. Accounting and Finance. 42(3): 195-223.
[22]. Harding, N., and K. T. Trotman. 2011. Enhancing Professional Skepticism via the Fraud Brainstorming Discussion Outcomes. Working Paper, The University of New South Wales.
[23]. He, X., J. Pittman., O. M. Rui, and D. Wu. 2014. Do Social Ties between External Auditors and Audit Committee Members Affect Audit Quality?. Working Paper, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics.
[24]. Kim, S., and K. T. Trotman. 2015. The Comparative Effect of Process and Outcome Accountability in Enhancing Professional Scepticism. Accounting & Finance. 55(4): 1015-1040.
[25]. Knechel, W. R., G. V. Krishnan., M. Pevzner., L. B. Shefchik, and U. K. Velury. 2013. Audit Quality: Insights from the Academic Literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 32(1): 385-421.
[26]. Knechel, W. R., S. E. Salterio, and N. Kochetova-Kozloski. 2010. The Effect of Benchmarked Performance Measures and Strategic Analysis on Auditors’ Risk Assessments and Mental Models. Accounting, Organizations and Society 35(3): 316– 333.
[27]. Libby, R., and J. Luft 1993. Determinants of Judgment Performance in Accounting Settings: Ability, Knowledge, Motivation, and Environment. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 18(5): 425-450.
[28]. Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland (ICAS). 2012. A Professional Judgment Framework for Financial Reporting. An International Guide for Preparers, Auditors, Regulators and Standard Setters.
[29]. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2012. Professional Skepticism in an Audit of Financial Statements. IAASB Staff Questions and Answers. New York, NY: IFAC.
[30]. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB). 2015. International standards of auditing (ISA) No. 240. The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements. New York, NY: IFAC.
[31]. ———. 2015.International standards of auditing (ISA) No. 260. Communication with Those Charged with Governance. New York, NY: IFAC.
[32]. ———. 2015.International standards of auditing (ISA) No. 200. Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with International Standards on Auditing. New York, NY: IFAC.
[33]. ———. 2015.International standards of auditing (ISA) No. 315. Identifying and Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment. New York, NY: IFAC
[34]. Mahjoub, M. O. 2012. The Proposed Framework for the Development of the Role of International Auditing Standards to Streamline the Auditor’s Personal Judgment. Scientific Journal of Economy and Commerce. 3(3):1053-1093.
[35]. Mala, R., and P. Chand. 2015. Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Auditing and Accounting: Future Research Implications of Person, Task, and Environment Perspective. Accounting Perspectives. 14(1): 1-50.
[36]. Moore, G. 2009. Using Professional Judgment. The Auditor Report 33:(1). Available at: http://aaahq.org
[37]. Morrill, J. 2005. Professional Judgment and Departures from GAAP: Judgment in Jeopardy Revisited. Canadian Accounting Perspectives. 4(2): 285-299.
[38]. Nelson, M. and H. T. Tan. 2005. Judgment and Decision Making Research in Auditing: A Task, Person, and Interpersonal Interaction Perspective. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 24(1): 41-71.
[39]. Pedro Sánchez Ballesta, J., and E. García-Meca. 2005. Audit Qualifications and Corporate Governance in Spanish Listed Firms. Managerial Auditing Journal. 20(7): 725-738.
[40]. Phillips, J. R., K. Jollineau, and S. Jane. 2015. Are Judgments About Auditor Liability Influenced by Audit Committee Expertise and Independence?. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com
[41]. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). 2012. Maintaining and Applying Professional Skepticism in Audits. Staff Audit Practice Alert No.10. Washington, DC: PCAOB.
[42]. Quadackers, L., T. Groot, and A. Wright. 2009. Auditors' Skeptical Characteristics and Their Relationship to Skeptical Judgments and Decisions. Working paper. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1478105
[43]. Ranzilla, S., R. Chevalier., G. Herrmann., S. Glover, and D. Prawitt. 2013. Elevating Professional Judgment in Auditing and Accounting: The KPMG Professional Judgment Framework. New York, NY: KPMG LLP.
[44]. Rittenberg, L. E. 2012. Comments on Governance, Professional Skepticism, and Auditor Independence. Working paper.
[45]. Robinson, D. R., and L. A. Owens-Jackson. 2009. Audit Committee Characteristics and Auditor Changes. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal. 13: 117- 132.
[46]. Sami, M. 2009. The Role of Audit Committees in Corporate Governance and Its Impact on the Quality of Financial Statements Published in the Egyptian Business Environment. Journal of the Faculty of Commerce Research.46(2):171-213.
[47]. Shaheen, A. H. 2001. Analysis of Theory and Practice in the Field of Auditing in the Egyptian Environment with Field Study Problems. Journal of New Horizons. 13(2):11-90.
[48]. Sharma, D. S., E. F. Boo, and V. D. Sharma. 2008. The Impact of Non?Mandatory Corporate Governance on Auditors’ Client Acceptance, Risk and Planning Judgments. Accounting and Business Research. 38(2): 105-120.
[49]. Soliman, M., and M. A. Elsalam. 2013. Corporate Governance Practices and Audit Quality: An Empirical Study of the Listed Companies in Egypt. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com
[50]. Solomon, I., and M. D. Shields. 1995. Judgment and decision research in auditing. In Judgment and Decision Making Research in Accounting and Auditing, eds. R. H. Ashton and A. H. Ashton, 137–75. New York: Cambridge University Press
[51]. ———., and K. T. Trotman. 2003. Experimental Judgment and Decision Research in Auditing:25 The first 25 years of AOS. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 28 (4): 395–412.
[52]. Wilbanks, R. M., D. R. Hermanson, and V. D. Sharma. 2015. Audit Committee Oversight of Fraud Risk: The Role of Social Ties and Governance Characteristics. Working Paper, Kennesaw State University.
[53]. Wolsoky, H. W. 2002. Guide to Oversight and Corporate Reform Law. Practical Accountant. Sep:26-33.
[54]. Zhang, Y., J. Zhou, and N. Zhou. 2007. Audit Committee Quality, Auditor Independence, and Internal Control Weaknesses. Journal of accounting and public policy. 26(3): 300-327.