International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
THE IMPACTS OF FOUR INNOVATION TYPES ON FIRM PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF ENTERPRISES IN VIETNAM

Authors:
Nguyen Mai Nhu Cam , Tran Thi Anh Phuong and Tran Thi Bach Yen

|| ||

Nguyen Mai Nhu Cam1 , Tran Thi Anh Phuong2 and Tran Thi Bach Yen1
1. GIZ, Can Tho University, Vietnam
2. School of Business, Greenwich University, Vietnam

MLA 8
Cam, Nguyen Mai Nhu, et al. "THE IMPACTS OF FOUR INNOVATION TYPES ON FIRM PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF ENTERPRISES IN VIETNAM." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 6, no. 10, Oct. 2021, pp. 3659-3674, doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2021.v06i10.001. Accessed Oct. 2021.
APA 6
Cam, N., Phuong, T., & Yen, T. (2021, October). THE IMPACTS OF FOUR INNOVATION TYPES ON FIRM PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF ENTERPRISES IN VIETNAM. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 6(10), 3659-3674. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2021.v06i10.001
Chicago
Cam, Nguyen Mai Nhu, Tran Thi Anh Phuong, and Tran Thi Bach Yen. "THE IMPACTS OF FOUR INNOVATION TYPES ON FIRM PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF ENTERPRISES IN VIETNAM." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 6, no. 10 (October 2021), 3659-3674. Accessed October, 2021. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2021.v06i10.001.

References

[1]. Artz, K. W., Norman, P. M., Hatfield, D. E. & Cardinal, L. B. (2010), ‘A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of R&D, Patents, and Product Innovation on Firm Performance’, The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 724-740.
[2]. Atalay, M., Anafarta, N. & Sarvan, F. (2013), ‘The relationship between innovation and firm performance: An empirical evidence from Turkish automotive supplier industry’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 75, 226-235.
[3]. Audretch, D. B., Coad, A. & Segarra, A. (2014), ‘Firm growth and innovation’, Small Business Economics, 43, 743 - 749.
[4]. Barney, J. (1991), ‘Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage’, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, 99-120.
[5]. Chun, H., Kim, J. W., Morck, R. & Yeung, B. (2008), ‘Creative destruction and firm-specific heterogeneity’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.98(1), 109-135.
[6]. Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgård, A., & Sharma, D. D. (1997). National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490104
[7]. Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (2004). New lists: Fundamentals and survival rates. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.04.001
[8]. Filatotchev, I., Stephan, J., & Jindra, B. (2008). Ownership structure, strategic controls and export intensity of foreign-invested firms in transition economies. Journal of International Business Studies. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400404
[9]. Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K. & Alpkan, L. (2011), ‘Effects of innovation types on fim performance’, International Journal of Production Economics, 133, 662-676.
[10]. Gurbuz, A. O. & Aybars, A. (2010), ‘The impact of foreign ownership on firm performance, Evidence from an emerging market: Turkey’, American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 2(4), 350-359.
[11]. Hall, B. H, Lotti, F. & Mairesse, J. (2009), 'Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy’, Small Business Economics, 33, 13-33.
[12]. Jalbert, T., Jalbert, M. & Furumo, K. (2013), ‘The relationship between CEO gender Financial Performance and Financial Management’, Journal of Business and Economics Research, Vol.11(1), 25-33.
[13]. Kostopoulos, K. C., Spanos, Y. E. & Prastacos, G. P. (2003), ‘The Resource – Based View of the Firm and Innovation: Identification of Critical Linkages’.
[14]. Lazar, S. (2016), ‘Determinants of firm performance: Evidence from Romanian listed company’, Review of Economics & Business Studies, Vol.9(1), 53-69.
[15]. Lee, R., Lee, J. H. & Garrett, T. C. (2019), ‘Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance’, Journal of Business Research, Vol.99, 507 - 515.
[16]. Pervan, M. &Viši?, J. (2012), ‘Influence of firm size on its business success’, Croatian Operational Research Review (CRORR), Vol. 3, No.1, 213-223.
[17]. Recica, F., Jackson, I., Hashi., I. & Krasniqi, B. A. (2019), ‘Innovation and the export performance of firms in transition economies: the relevance of the business environment and the stage of transition’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Vol. 38, No.4.
[18]. Rousseau, M. B., Mathias, B. D., Madden, L. T. & Crook, T. R. (2016), ‘Innovation, firm performance, and appropriation: A meta-analysis’, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.20, No.3, 1650033.
[19]. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). ‘Capitalism and the Process of Creative Destruction’. Monopoly Power and Economic Performance.
[20]. Smith, A. (1776). ‘An inquiry into the wealth of nations’, Strahan and Cadell, London.
[21]. Terziovski, M, (2010), ‘Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource?based view’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.31(8), 892 - 902.
[22]. Therrien, P., Doloreux, D., & Chamberlin, T. (2011). Innovation novelty and (commercial) performance in the service sector: A Canadian firm-level analysis. Technovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.07.007
[23]. Vo, D. Van. (2017). The impact of institutional difference on Vietnamese firms’ export intensity: The role of international experience. Science & Technology Development Journal - Economics - Law and Management. https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjelm.v1iq2.446
[24]. Wernerfelt, B. (1984), ‘A Resource-Based View of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 5, No. 2, 171 - 180.
[25]. White, H. (1980). A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity. Econometrica.
[26]. Zawawi, N. F. M., Wahah, S. A., Al-Mamun, A., Yaacob, A. A., Samy, N. K. & Fazal, S. A. (2016), ‘Defining the Concept of Innovation and Firm Innovativeness: A Critical Analysis from Resource-Based View Perspective’, International Journal of Business and Management, Vol.11, No.6, 87-94.

Abstract:
The paper aims to study the effect of innovation on firm performance of firms in Vietnam. Building upon theory of creative destruction and the resource-based view theory, this study hypothesizes that product innovation, marketing innovation, process innovation, and organizational innovation positively impact on the performance of firms in Vietnam. The survey data is extracted from the Vietnam 2019 Enterprise Surveys data set with 489 firms and linear regression model with Robust Standard Errors is employed. The empirical findings revealed that product innovation has the positive impact on firm performance of firms. Also, the findings imply that enhancing innovation activities inside and outside of firms as well as reinvestment process for those activities enable to facilitate firms improve their performance in Vietnam.

IJSSER is Member of