International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE TEACHING MODEL BY USING RESEARCH-BASED TO PROMOTE CREATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS OF STUDENTS OF FACULTY OF EDUCATION CHIANG MAI RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY THAILAND

Authors:
Jutamas Noonchart, Virapong Saeng-Xuto and Kreetha Kaewkhong

|| ||

Jutamas Noonchart, Virapong Saeng-Xuto and Kreetha Kaewkhong
Ph.D. Candidate (Education), Faculty of Education, Chiang Mai University, Thailand

MLA 8
Noonchart, Jutamas, et al. "THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE TEACHING MODEL BY USING RESEARCH-BASED TO PROMOTE CREATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS OF STUDENTS OF FACULTY OF EDUCATION CHIANG MAI RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY THAILAND." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 6, no. 2, Feb. 2021, pp. 544-564, doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2021.v06i02.011. Accessed Feb. 2021.
APA 6
Noonchart, J., Saeng-Xuto, V., & Kaewkhong, K. (2021, February). THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE TEACHING MODEL BY USING RESEARCH-BASED TO PROMOTE CREATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS OF STUDENTS OF FACULTY OF EDUCATION CHIANG MAI RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY THAILAND. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 6(2), 544-564. doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2021.v06i02.011
Chicago
Noonchart, Jutamas, Virapong Saeng-Xuto, and Kreetha Kaewkhong. "THE DEVELOPMENT OF SCIENCE TEACHING MODEL BY USING RESEARCH-BASED TO PROMOTE CREATIVE PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS OF STUDENTS OF FACULTY OF EDUCATION CHIANG MAI RAJABHAT UNIVERSITY THAILAND." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 6, no. 2 (February 2021), 544-564. Accessed February, 2021. doi:10.46609/IJSSER.2021.v06i02.011.

References

[1]. Ablon, J. S., & Pollastri, A. R. (2018). The school discipline fix: changing behavior using the collaborative problem solving approach. WW Norton & Company.
[2]. Andreu-Andrés, M. Á. (2016). Cooperative or collaborative learning: Is there a difference in university students' perceptions?/Aprendizaje cooperativo o colaborativo:¿ hay alguna diferencia en la percepción de los estudiantes universitarios?. Revista Complutense de Educación, 27(3), 1041.
[3]. Atkins, L. (2013). Researching ‘with’, not ‘on’: engaging marginalised learners in the research process. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 18(1-2), 143-158.
[4]. Buppasiri. (2009). Web-Based Instruction Project Based Learning ModelDevelopment for Career Enhance Skill of Industry for SeniorHigh School Student. Journal of Industrial Education, 11(1), 9-21.
[5]. Chang, E. C. (2017). Applying the broaden-and-build model of positive emotions to social problem solving: Does feeling good (vs. feeling bad) influence problem orientation, problem- solving skills, or both?. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 36(5), 380-395.
[6]. Dieu, H. D. T., Kim, O. D. T., & Bich, H. N. V. (2018, November). Sustainable Development of Collaborative Problem Solving Competency for Technical Students through Experiential Learning (A Case Study in Planning Skills Subject at Ho Chi Minh city University of Technology and Education). In 2018 4th International Conference on Green Technology and Sustainable Development (GTSD), 505-510. IEEE.
[7]. Educational Curriculum Basic. (2008). Educational curriculum Basic B.E. 2551. Chonburi: Chonradsadorn Amrung School.
[8]. Ellison. (1995). Creative Problem Solving Through Design Education : An Experimental Study. Canada: Mount Saint Vincent University.
[9]. Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165-184.
[10]. Gorgônio, F. L., Vale, K. M., Silva, Y. K. N., & Silva, H. M. (2017). Grouping students for cooperative and collaborative learning: Challenges and trends in virtual learning environments. In IEEE World Engineering Education Conference, Santos, Brazil.Retrieved from http://edunine. eu/edunine2017/proc/works/33. pdf.
[11]. Hass, R. W., & Beaty, R. E. (2018). Use or consequences: Probing the cognitive difference between two measures of divergent thinking. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2327.
[12]. Jeanjenjit, U. (2001). The study of scientific problem-solving abilities and skills Science experiment of 2nd year chemical engineering students who are taught by computer Help teach experiments Subject to analyzing water samples. Bangkok: Srinakarin University Rintorn Wirot Prasarnmit.
[13]. Jenjit. (2003). Teaching and learning activities in geometry using creative problem solving for high school students with a talent in math. Doctor of Education degree thesis Mathematics Program, Graduate School, Srinakharinwirot University.
[14]. Joyce and Weil. (1996). Model of Teaching. 5th ed. London: Ally n andBacon.
[15]. Karatas, H., Bademcioglu, M., & Celik, S. (2017). A Study on the Relationship between Problem Solving Skills and Multiple Intelligences of High School Students. International Journal of Education and Practice, 5(10), 171-181.
[16]. Khaemmanee. (2002). “Learning management by learners uses research as part of the learning process: Principles, Guidelines and Methods”. Teaching and learning by students use research as part of the learning process. Bangkok: The Teachers Council of Thailand Press, Ladprao.
[17]. Khemmanee. (2005). Pedagogy: Knowledge for effective learning process.12th edition. Bangkok: Press Office of Chulalongkorn University.
[18]. Ladda Phu Kiat. (2009). Teaching project style and research-based teaching: work that teachers can do. Bangkok: Saha & Sun Printing Company Limited.
[19]. Office of Academic Affairs and Study. (2011). From focus Developing learners… into the classroom Learning management. 1st edition, Bangkok: Printing house of Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand, Ltd.
[20]. Laoriendee, W. (2010). Model of learning management strategy for developing thinking skills. 5th edition. Nakhon Pathom: Silpakorn University.
[21]. McLeod, S. (2018). Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. Simply Psychology.
[22]. Mohan, R. (2019). Innovative science teaching. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd..
[23]. Moonkham, S. (2004). Complete the idea of thinking. 3rd edition, Bangkok: Photo prints.
[24]. Pollastri, A. R., Ablon, J. S., & Hone, M. J. (Eds.). (2019). Collaborative Problem Solving: An Evidence-Based Approach to Implementation and Practice. Springer.
[25]. Pumchat. (2009). Developing a model for creating creative problem-solving experiences for Early childhood. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. Curriculum and Instruction Program, Graduate school, Silpakorn University.
[26]. Scandura, J. M. (2017). Structural Learning (Volume 1): Theory and Research. Routledge.
[27]. Schiever. (1986). The Effect of Two Teaching/Learning Model onthe Higher Cognitive Processes of Students in Classes for the Gifted (Parnes CPS, TABA). Dissertation Abstracts International.
[28]. Treffinger. (2007). “A New Renaissance? PreparingProductive Thinkers for Tomorrow’s World”. Creative Learning Today, 15(4): 1.
[29]. Treffinger and Isaksen. (2008). “A New Renaissance? PreparingProductive Thinkers for Tomorrow’s World”. Creative Learning Today, 15(4): 1.
[30]. Weir. (1974). “Problem solving is everybody’ problem.”. The Science Teacher, 41: 16-18.
[31]. Zambrano, J., Kirschner, F., Sweller, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2019). Effects of prior knowledge on collaborative and individual learning. Learning and Instruction, 63, 101214.

Abstract:
The purposes of this research were to:1) develop and determine the efficiency of the science teaching model by using research-based,2) evaluate the effectiveness of the science teaching model by using research-based. 34 students who studied elementary education major of Faculty of Education at Chiang Mai Rajabhat University, 2018 were drawn to be the sample of the study. They were selected from simple random sampling. Research instruments consisted of the science teaching model by using research-based, a handbook for the model, units and lesson plans, research skills assessment forms, and creative problem-solving skills tests. The data were analyzed by Mean, Standard Deviation, a T-Test Dependent, and content analysis. The results found that: 1) the model has consisted of five elements; these were (1) principles (2) objective (3) the learning process (4) the 3-part assessments and (5) the important conditions for using the model met the efficiency of 81.36/76.86, 2) The effectiveness of the model indicated that 2.1) after using the model, the students’ creative problem-solving skills were significantly higher than before the instruction at .05level,2.2) the students who had different basic abilities and learning styles had higher development of research skills from a moderate level to a high level, and had higher development of creative problem-solving skills from a low level to a moderate level, 2.3) the retention of research skills were found only in the students that had high basic abilities and low basic abilities, the collaborative learning styles and dependent learning styles, all groups of the students had retention of creative problem-solving skills at the follow-up phase.

IJSSER is Member of