International Journal of Social Science & Economic Research
Submit Paper

Title:
RASHTRIYA UCHCHATAR SHIKSHA ABHIYAN (RUSA) AND ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION

Authors:
Dr. Ummed Singh and Aryan Chanda

|| ||

Dr. Ummed Singh1 and Aryan Chanda2
1.Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Master’s student, Department of Economics, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

MLA 8
Singh, Dr. Ummed, and Aryan Chanda. "RASHTRIYA UCHCHATAR SHIKSHA ABHIYAN (RUSA) AND ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, vol. 8, no. 12, Dec. 2023, pp. 3983-4001, doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2023.v08i12.020. Accessed Dec. 2023.
APA 6
Singh, D., & Chanda, A. (2023, December). RASHTRIYA UCHCHATAR SHIKSHA ABHIYAN (RUSA) AND ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION. Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research, 8(12), 3983-4001. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2023.v08i12.020
Chicago
Singh, Dr. Ummed, and Aryan Chanda. "RASHTRIYA UCHCHATAR SHIKSHA ABHIYAN (RUSA) AND ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION." Int. j. of Social Science and Economic Research 8, no. 12 (December 2023), 3983-4001. Accessed December, 2023. https://doi.org/10.46609/IJSSER.2023.v08i12.020.

References

[1]. Gupta, S., & Patel, K. (2019). Assessing the Impact of RashtriyaUchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) on Accessibility to Higher Education in Indian States. Indian Journal of Education, 45(2), 176-192.
[2]. Kumar, A., & Sharma, N. (2017). Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing RashtriyaUchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) for Enhancing Accessibility to Higher Education in India. International Journal of Educational Development, 55, 78-91.
[3]. Mehta, S. (2005).Measurement and Analysis of student’s engagement in university classes. Higher Education Research and Development. Vol 24 Issue 1. Retrieved and downloaded from https://complit.washington.edu on 19/05/2019.
[4]. Sharma, A., & Singh, R. (2020). Enhancing Accessibility to Higher Education: A Study of RashtriyaUchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) Scheme in India. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 39(4), 432-449.
[5]. Singh, V., & Gupta, R. (2016). Evaluating the Effectiveness of RashtriyaUchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) in Improving Accessibility to Higher Education: A Case Study of Selected States. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 3(1), 45-62.
[6]. Tiwari, P., & Mishra, S. (2018). Accessibility to Higher Education in India: A Review of RashtriyaUchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) Scheme. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 32(3), 279-295.
[7]. Varghese, N.V & Michaela, M (2014).Governance reforms in higher education: A study of institutional autonomy in Asian countries. Retrieved and downloaded from http://www.unesco.orgon 27/7/2016.

ABSTRACT:
The paper attempts to study the accessibility to higher education in the context of the Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan (RUSA) Scheme in India. With an increasing demand for higher education, particularly among marginalized and underrepresented communities, the RUSA scheme stands out as a significant initiative aimed at improving accessibility and equity in higher education. Beginning by overview of higher education in India, the paper sheds light on disparities in access and participation. The paper evaluates the effect of RUSA interventions during its first initial phase (RUSA 1.0) on indicators of accessibility such as enrollment rates, average enrollment per college, college density, and pupil-teacher ratio. To analyze the extent of variation and asymmetry in key indicators related to higher education the statistical measures such as the coefficient of variation and skewness have been applied and to analyze the equality of means across these indicators, the paper used the ANOVA and Welch's F-tests.

IJSSER is Member of